Click here for a link to a presentation I did about analytics. Preview Below.

Looking at strategy & markets through data science and machine intelligence.
Click here for a link to a presentation I did about analytics. Preview Below.

Regional online media engagement for German and French EPP MEP’s: The chart clearly illustrates Germany is not engaged with their European Parliament representation, or better, the MEPs are clearly not in touch with their constituents. Can someone say democratic deficit?
In the global political environment a holistic view is needed.
The standard for message delivery is high in the modern media environments. It’s vital to create communications that people identify and empathize with. The threshold to get attention, and to get people to retain your information, is even higher. Politics now competes with Pepsi, Nike and Apple. No one will take time to care about your views or propositions. Firms must be proactive in both controlling and framing language, as well as marginalizing their communication and political strategy for efficiency.
The problem: There are many variables to consider when developing productive communication and political strategies. Further, basing decisions on just educated guessing, even for the most highly skilled and experienced professional, does not meet the standards of modern business practices, which use analytics to make decisions.
The Solution: Online media provides an immense amount of information which can be monitored. The data can be used to track political and policy instances qualitatively, as well as forecast.
To do this, we must synthesize research in cognitive linguistics and Natural Language Processing (NLP). In the last few years these technologies have evolved to the point where pragmatics can be quantified accurately. And further, because of the amount of data an average person creates in a day, we have and endless amount of information to drill down into for examining political and cultural phenomenon.
I’m currently looking at the French elections. There will be more on that and this in a bit.
The Chart shows the correlation of Media comments and Facebook posts, in reaction to Twitter output , in regards to GOP primary Candidates. It’s no surprise there is a downward trend for Facebook. The two channels tend to be segregated politically. Twitter being more conservative and Facebook being more liberal.
Pinterest and Instagram.
Both simple. At most, do a couple of things well. Proper UI design, much like popular mobile apps, are following this trend.
How to communicate this as the company grows? An XY chart between brand/Product segregation and or consolidation. Then funneling down all that you do, to a few words such as “it just works”. Take note from minimalist art.
Much focus is on generating the most content possible without questioning the impact of the syntax/semantics/meaning. Simply, two words with well thought out connotation will have more sustainability than one thousand with a bad frame.
The reason why campaigns are successful is because they are empathetic, built on identity and play into our innate cognitive make up. Not because of the channel it was on.
Cool Map from the Google Election Centre. I suggest you check it out http://www.google.com/elections/ed/us/trends
CHANNEL BREAK DOWN:

Recently, I was doing a project to see if there was a correlation of war themed News and the Search interest. I found that there was indeed. .86 for Iraq and a .46 correlation for the strategically framed “War on Terror” language. I guess Chomsky and Lakoff are/were right. These findings are also in line with a study in 2010 by Daniela V. Dimitrova and Jesper Strömbäck. Their research concluded that U.S. Elite newspapers had higher patterns of military conflict framing, and used more official government and military sources. In contrast, Elite Swedish newspapers displayed more “responsibility and anti-war protest framing”, and were more critical of the war.
I’m very surprised Santorum, though unelectable to the general population, is still in the race still. Although the more Romney talks, the harder it is to watch. It’s almost like he hires too many “Yes Men”. He needs a campaign manager that will slap him when he goes on a rant about trees in Michigan. Who says that kind of stuff? I predict this now; Obama wins..