The relationship between humans, machines and markets

Technology has increased access to information, making the world more similar on a macro and sub-macro level. However, despite the increased similarity, research shows business models are rarely horizontal, emphasizing the importance of micro-level strategic consideration. Companies routinely enter new markets relying on knowledge of how their industry works and the competencies that led to success in their home markets while not being cognizant of granular details that can make the difference between success and failure in a new market. Only through machine-driven intelligence can companies address the level of detail needed in a scalable and fast manner to remain competitive.

Research from Harvard Business Review reveal that despite an increase in information and globalization, business models are generally not horizontally scalable from one country to the next.
Research from Harvard Business Review shows that despite more access to information and networks through globalization, business models, 86% of the time, do not work from one country to the next.
Relying on simple explanations for complex phenomena is a risk - 3% of markets have a negative correlation to one another. Therefore organizations need to contextualize marketplace characteristics and avoid addressing only one variable at a time.
Relying on simple explanations for complex phenomena is risky—3% of markets have a negative correlation to one another. Therefore, organizations need to contextualize marketplace characteristics and avoid simplistic linear or binary-based KPIs.
Pos Correlation HBR
The world is complex, but computational power is getting more robust and cheaper while machines are getting smarter. Despite the fact that only 11% of country-to-country profitability had a positive relationship, asset-rich large organizations with large networks and infrastructure are uniquely positioned to exploit this if they learn to understand their assets in higher resolution. In most cases, this means letting go of long-held beliefs and how things used to be done, in addition to being agnostic about how to make money.
Amount of shares traded on the NYSE. This data, can be used as an analog to show how quickly information and connectivity is growing exponentially.
The number of shares traded on the NYSE is shown as an analog to illustrate how quickly information grows exponentially yearly. Despite advancements in communication technology, companies are no better at market access.

Furthermore, machine intelligence and information have led to the rapidly diminishing value of expertise and eroding the value of information. The expertise needed to outrun or beat machine intelligence has exponentially increased yearly. Over the next one to two years, the most successful companies will accept the burden of proof that they have switched from technologies and AI to human expertise. Furthermore, machines will come to reframe what business and strategy mean. Business expertise in the future will be the ability to synthesize and explore data sets and create options using augmented intelligence – not being an expert on a subject per se. The game changers will have the fastest “information to action” at scale.

A residual of that characteristic makes a “good” or “ok” decision’s value exponentially highest at the beginning – and oftentimes much more valuable than a perfect decision. To address this trend, organizations must focus on developing processes and internal communication that foster faster “information-to-action” opportunity cost transaction times, similar to how traders look at financial markets. Those margins of competitive edge will continue to shrink but will become exponentially more valuable.

Speed to market and competitive advantage

Why businesses harnessing AI and other technologies are leading the way

Studies show experts consistently fail at forecasting and traditionally perform worse than random guessing in businesses as diverse as medicine, real estate valuation, and political elections. This is because people traditionally weigh experiences and information in very biased ways. In the knowledge economy, this is detrimental to strategy and business decisions.

Working with machines enables businesses to learn and quantify connections and influence in ways humans cannot. An issue is rarely isolated to the confines of a specific domain, and part of Walmart’s analytics strategy is to focus on key variables in the context of other variables that are connected. This can be done in extremely high resolution by taking a machine-based approach to mining disparate data sets, ultimately allowing flexibility and higher-resolution KPIs to make business decisions.

The effects of digital disintermediation and the sharing economy on productivity growth

Machines have increased humans’ ability to synthesize multiple information streams simultaneously, as well as our ability to communicate these insights, which should lead to a higher utility on assets. In the future, businesses will likely have to be more focused on opportunity cost and re-imagine asset allocation with increased competition due to lower barriers to entry. Inherently, intelligence and insights are about decisions.  A residual of that characteristic makes a good or ok decision’s value exponentially highest in the beginning – and oftentimes more valuable than a perfect decision. To address this trend, organizations must focus on developing processes and internal communication that foster faster “information-to-action” transaction times, much like how traders look at financial markets.

Is this the beginning of the end?

Frameworks driven by machines will allow humans to focus on more meaningful and creative strategies that cut through the noise to find what variables can be controlled, mitigating superficial processes and problems. As a result, it is the end for people and companies that rely on information and routine for work. And the beginning for those who can solve abstract problems with creative and unorthodox thinking within tight margins. Those who do so will also be able to scale those skills globally with advancements in communication technology and the sharing economy, which will considerably speed up liquidity on hard and knowledge-based assets.

Nobody Cares

The first three rules of communications.

Nobody cares.
Nobody cares.
Nobody cares.

It’s time marketers realize people are exposed so much media noise and syntax that to stand out, it’s time to start just being direct and have a good product. Talking a lot and being “social” is most of the time fake and annoying. No one cares outside of something that is 98% relevant or actually extraordinary. Now’s the time to only be extraordinary.

– CT

Funneling Your Brand

Pinterest and  Instagram.

Both simple. At most, do a couple of things well. Proper UI design, much like popular mobile apps, are following this trend.

How to communicate this as the company grows? An XY chart between brand/Product segregation and or consolidation. Then funneling down all that you do, to a few words such as “it just works”. Take note from minimalist art.

“Content”

Much focus is on generating the most content possible without questioning the impact of the syntax/semantics/meaning. Simply, two words with well thought out connotation will have more sustainability than one thousand with a bad frame.

The reason why campaigns are successful is because they are empathetic, built on identity and play into our innate cognitive make up. Not because of the channel it was on.


Super Tues MAP via Google Election Center

Cool Map from the Google Election Centre. I suggest you check it out http://www.google.com/elections/ed/us/trends

 

CHANNEL BREAK DOWN:

Twitter Wins

 

Presentation: Communication Principles

This is the presentation that started it all in Brussels.

http://app.sliderocket.com:80/app/fullplayer.aspx?id=1bbfd9ff-188c-486e-92fd-4f394f2ef1ce

NLP: Value Greater than just Positive and Negative Sentiment.

Positive (P) and negative (N) sentiment are just transmitting two results based on many other variables. This in itself contains little knowledge. For creating strategy, it can only bench mark after the fact.

Inherently the use of data is to make better decisions for the future. Production is expensive and time consuming. So is deductive reasoning.  The main goals should be to move away from adjusting to the end reaction and migrate to a predictive model. Look at the context in higher resolution i.e. control for  variables which lead to PN sentiment.

Here are some suggestions

  • Time of day
  • Medium (Twitter,Facebook ,Blogs, Mainstream news)
  • Comments PN sentiment
  • New dissemination to comment count (time, PN)

If you are advanced, use NLP tools that allow for custom taxonomies – within the NLP,  to create rules on varibels like types of framing. On a medium level this is very good at prediction, but more on that later.

Ciao

Social Media is Simple

Social Media is no longer “Social Media”, it’s media. No need to differentiate. I hate the term. It’s something a 15 year old girl or a bubbly fresh out of communications studies BA says. It’s over. It’s main stream. All media is, and always was social. Quit wasting time “trying to understand it”. Get used to not understanding, trust  real-time data, then refine. If you are one of the many people wasting time trying to understand/define media by this point, it’s probably best to just hire someone who does. The discussion is over. It’s about doing now.Ask your self or your “media expert”: “What is the end game. Why do we do this?”
The reason why media is important (It’s really simple):
  1. Empathy
  2. Data – Analytics,Text and Context Mining
  3. SEO
  4. Use data for empathetic branding and communications

Let me remind you to never set rules out side of these. There’s always new apps and gadgets but the core of sound  communications is empathy.There is nothing else to it. It’s really that simple. No need to waste money and time on some BS discussion.

Empathy, nothing more.

Using Klout and Digital Influence

“The race is for a  system  digital currency wield the most social influence. One particular player has emerged, Klout, determined to establish their platform as the authority of digital influence. Klout’s attempt to convert digital influence into business value underscores a much bigger movement which we’ll continue to see play out in the next year. To some degree everyone now has some digital influence (not just celebrities, academics, policy makers or those who sway public opinion). But for the next year, the cult of influence becomes less about consumer plays like Klout and more about the tools and techniques professionals use to “score” digital influence and actually harness, scale and measure the results of it.”

– Just use Klout for Accountability. If the communications Unit’s goal is to get online, Klout can be a good way to hold people accountable. Nothing more at this point but there seems to be potential.